Ask a parent a simple question; would you like your kid in a class with 25 kids or 37 kids? I think we all know the answer. Parents want more individual attention for their child, doesn’t everyone? Class size is where it all starts. As we head into election season, we should be asking our candidates how they plan on addressing overcrowding in our Arizona classrooms.
Overcrowding is happening in countless schools across the valley and state, and now it’s so prevalent, it has become the new normal. I have heard all the debates; larger classes save money, and small classes are expensive to maintain. So what is the ideal class size? In our state, it’s around 32 or so, but the further East you go that number drops to about 25.
Did you know that class sizes have an even more long-term effect than most people realize? In fact, when you look at kids who spent their earlier years (kindergarten -3rd grade) in smaller classes, the benefits go far beyond test scores. Research shows that kids in smaller classes also are less likely to drop out, more likely to complete high school, and more likely to go on to college. There is even data to support that kids in smaller classes are more likely to go onto STEM careers.
When I first started teaching, I had a roster of 120 kids. Back then this was considered a lot. It equated to a class average around 22 per class. I used to use notebooks and journals so I could really get deep in understanding my student’s pedagogy for solving problems in my science class. I graded them meticulously and was able to offer weekly and sometimes daily feedback that really helped kids with their growth as the year progressed. I often look back on those times and think about how I never knew how good I had it.
Today that climate is long gone and in order to stay on top of an immense workload closer to 37 kids in a class, we have to use technology, multiple choice, and spot checks to get kids thru the semester. It’s not terrible, but not ideal. It’s, unfortunately the best we can do with 180 + students’ papers to grade every week. The ability to get to the kids “Hiding in the Back” is hampered by the shear volume. Though many teachers do make the effort, I know of many that can’t and won’t.
It takes me about two hours to score one homework assignment for my 175 + or – students. You do the math; if I grade 4 assignments a week, I just added at a minimum,an extra work day to my week (8 + or – hours) . It’s not even possible with class sizes on the scale that we teach now. As much as I love grading, I still have to feed, play, and do homework, with my own kids when I get home at night. And frankly I can’t give that up.
My point is, there is a big difference between 25 and 37 students in a room. The numerous studies I found all lead to the same conclusion, class size matters. The lower the number of students and the more one- on- one contact a student receives equates to higher achievement scores. Those extra minutes make all the difference, and there are piles of research to support that claim.
So why don’t we follow the research and use data to make decisions that help kids… Simply put, we are not playing the long game. One of the toughest walls to get past is that school districts themselves typically don’t like sharing class size data. Evidence of overcrowding is not exactly favorable for a school districts image. Our decisions on this issue are reactionary due to continually dwindling education budgets and a non-appreciation for long-term gains in favor of a quick fix to put a warm body in a classroom before the 1st day of school.
How can we ever possibly hope to bring down class sizes with a net loss of 4000+ teachers every year statewide? Good luck trying to get teachers to take on classrooms of 37 kids with no end in sight for meager wages. Until a fundamental shift occurs in how we look at what a classroom size should be, from kinder to graduation, things are not going to get any better.
Your vote in November will be the message to our decision makers on how we proceed, and in the event, you need some data to backup your argument please allow me to provide you with some of my favorite research pieces on the subject below. The STAR study (10) is by far my favorite. About 900,000 kids results are pretty conclusive.
1) Baker, B. D., Farrie, D. and Sciarra, D. G. (2016), Mind the Gap: 20 Years of Progress and Retrenchment in School Funding and Achievement Gaps. ETS Research Report Series, 2016: 1–37.
2) Mathis, William J. (2016). Research-Based Options for Education Policymaking: The Effectiveness of Class Size Reduction. National Education Policy Center, University of Colorado.
3) Jackson, C. Kirabo., Johnson, Rucker C., Persico, Claudia. (forthcoming) The Effects of School Spending on Educational And Economic Outcomes: Evidence from School Finance Reforms The Quarterly Journal of Economics.
4) Zyngier, David. (2014). Class size and academic results, with a focus on children from culturally, linguistically and economically disenfranchised communities. Evidence Base, issue 1, 2014
5) Schanzenbach, D. W. (2014). Does Class Size Matter? National Education Policy Center Policy Brief.
6) Dynarski, S., Hyman, J., & Schanzenbach, D. W. (2013). Experimental Evidence on the Effect of Childhood Investments on Postsecondary Attainment and Degree Completion[G78] . Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 32(4): 692-717
7) Achilles, C. M., et al. (2012). Class-size Policy: The Star Experiment and Related Class-size Studies. NCPEA Policy Brief, 1.2.
8) Shin, Yongyun. (2012). Do Black Children Benefit More From Small Classes? Multivariate Instrumental Variable Estimators With Ignorable Missing Data. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 37
9) Bascia, N. (2010). Reducing Class Size: What do we Know?. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education..”
10) Word, Elizabeth et al. (1990) The State Of Tennessee’s Student/Teacher Achievement Ratio (STAR) Project Technical Report Part I and Part II. Commissioned by the Tennessee State Dept. of Education.